Resource Integration

This page is a conditions-preparation tool, not investment advice.It only tells you which of the four hard conditions is missing and what to fix at this step; it promises no return.
Every threshold here (the 5% trial-order line, the ≥2-point demand verification, ≥5 firms / ≥3 months, ≤30% change cost, the pass bars for I1–I4) comes from the internal methodology doc 《02-资源整合算法.md v1.0》 (domestic machine /opt/inventory/econ_algorithms/, read-only, untouched this round), and has not been externally validated —— these are internal practice thresholds, not academic findings.
Where it is not aligned / has been simplified (said plainly)
· ① The four judgments after the trial order ends (§4 Step4: it made money / they would come back / the rules raised no dispute / it does not depend on you personally) are not implemented, because they are inputs that only exist once the trial is done; this page merely quotes that text under “trial-order plan”.
· ② The ✅ marks in the matching matrix come from the chip numbers you entered under “which of my chips they need”, not from semantic matching —— the doc lays down no automatic matching rule and this page does not guess one.
· ③ The chip difficulty score is a 1–5 self-rating; this page uses only the single threshold §4 Step1 gives (“≤2 does not count as a chip”) and processes it no further.
· ④ Demand verification is scored per prospect; if a letter in a prospect line is misspelt (not T/P/A) it is ignored and scores nothing.
Unconfirmed
· Unconfirmed ①: in the doc's §6 “key external data” table, the two items “the other side's purchase price / cost structure” and “competitor or comparable integration cases” are not tied to any particular integration type —— this page cannot tell which type they ought to block, so it only flags them in the preparation list and does not use them to rule any type out.
· Unconfirmed ②: the scope type's external-data gate is left empty (see the note, “the doc does not give one”). It is the only place on the page handled as “no gate if not done”.
· Unconfirmed ③: §4 Step2's “total ≥2 points” is computed per prospect; this page scores each prospect separately, and one passing means I2 passes —— the doc does not say how many prospects must pass, so this page does not set a number for it (§5.2 only says that “≥1 of 3 people is already spending money” is the bar for the remedy to be sufficient).

[Evidence section · where to check each number]
① Source: internal methodology doc 《02-资源整合算法.md》v1.0 (domestic machine /opt/inventory/econ_algorithms/02-资源整合算法.md, read-only): chips / demand verification / matching matrix / trial judgments / priority = §4 Step1–Step5; I1–I4 and the per-type extra conditions = §3; external-data gates = §6. Literature in §1 (Barney 1991, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108; Pfeffer & Salancik 1978; Granovetter 1973).
② Three categories
· [Verifiable] Chips scoring ≤2 on difficulty do not count (§4 Step1), demand verification T=1 / P=2 / A=1 且合计 ≥2 (§4 Step2), the matching matrix (§4 Step3), I1–I4 (§3), the per-type extra conditions (≥5 firms / ≥3 months, change cost ≤ 30% of the original cost, ≥1 intermediary), the priority 范围型>互补型>规模型>网络型 —— all of these match §3 / §4.
· [This page's presentation choice] The ✅ in the matching matrix are obtained by comparing the chip numbers you entered, not by semantic matching; where the doc's §6 gives no data item specific to the scope type, this page treats it as “no gate if not done” —— those two are the page's trade-offs.
· [No source found] The figures 5% trial line, ≥2 points, ≥5 firms / ≥3 months, ≤30% change cost carry no external citation in the md (§1 gives only conceptual sources) → no source found (internal practice thresholds). The scope type's external-data gate is not listed in the doc's §6, which is a gap in the doc (this page does not invent a gate on its behalf).
③ How to check it yourself: enter a chip as 配方|5 → difficulty 5 > 2, so it should count as 1 chip; enter a prospect as 老王|P|1 → demand score P=2 ≥ 2 should pass, and the cell for chip no. 1 in the matrix should get a ✅. Change the chip difficulty to 1 and rerun → 0 chips → I1 should fail.