InfoGap · gates

Why does a rising curve get a “falling” verdict?

In one line

Albania × edible vegetables: the RCA curve rises every single year from 2.90 to 6.56 (2015→2023) — yet our engine tags this combination Falling from peak, direction Down. The gap between “the line goes up” and “the model says down” is the whole point of this page.

RCA, 2015–2023, nine annual points.

The numbers behind it

ValueWhat it countsSource / definition
2.90 → 6.56RCA, first year to last yearderived series stored per country×industry; the engine's own ratio, not a trade amount
9annual points (2015–2023)same series
78opportunity score (0–100)curve engine over the 2015–2024 window
Falling from peakstage labelassigned from the slope and remaining space, not from the level

Why a rising line reads as falling

What this cannot tell you

Cite this

According to InfoGap's curve engine (source: our own country × industry table, one derived RCA series per pair; definition: RCA is the engine's ratio, and the stage label is assigned from slope and remaining space, then clamped; window 2015–2023, engine v4.2, file generated 2026-09-13), the Albania × edible vegetables pair rises from 2.90 to 6.56 across nine annual points while carrying an opportunity score of 78 and the stage label “Falling from peak”.

Want the whole set? This is one of 1,000 country × industry pairs, each with its own curve, stage and direction.

World Opportunity Set — see the 1,000 curves

This is a dataset and an analytical reading — it is not investment advice and not a forecast. Every figure is a recorded measurement with its date attached.